Islamic Indoctrination goes to the Supreme Court

Justice

A public-interest legal group is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowing a California public school to engage in a three-week intensive course for 7th graders on how to “become Muslims.”

A California federal trial court and the 9th Circuit, widely considered the nation’s most liberal appeals court, determined the class did not violate the Constitution.

This is the same Court that ruled the pledge of alligience unconstitutional because it included the words, “under God”. If ever there were a questionable court it would be this one. They have made quite a name for themselves through controversial rulings.

The 2001 course had students take Islamic names and wear identification tags that displayed their new Islamic name and the Muslim star and crescent moon. They also were handed materials that instructed them to “Remember Allah always so that you may prosper”; complete the Islamic five pillars of faith, including fasting; and memorize and recite the “Bismillah,” or “In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate,” which students also wrote on banners hung on the classroom walls.

Students also played “jihad games” during the course, which was part of the school’s world history and geography program.

Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, said the “case cries out double standard.”

“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is the same court that held our Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional because it contained the phrase ‘under God,’ and yet they allow a three-week intensive course on how to become Muslims, including class memorization of Islamic prayers and participation in Islamic religious rituals,” Thompson said.

Edward L. White III, the Law Center’s trial counsel handling the case, argued that although a public school may teach about religion, the school district “went far beyond an explanation of the historical or literary significance of Islam and placed these seventh graders into the position of becoming trainees in that religion.”

“These young children were indoctrinated in Islam, which the Constitution forbids,” White said.

Continue reading

Saving the Unborn

Justice Life

Thank God. I know a lot of people have been praying for this.

South Dakota Gov Signs Abortion Ban, Planned Parenthood Lawsuit Expected

South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds signed legislation that would ban virtually all abortions in the state. The measure prohibits abortions with the lone rare exception of when the life of the mother is threatened.

Planned Barrenhood has vowed to fight this tooth and nail. They will probably file suit within the week. This will set up a showdown at the SCOTUS. I hope they decide that it’s within the state’s rights to limit or even ban abortion. Then each individual state will be able to make their own laws concerning this issue.

Pro-abortion forces know they would never have been able to make abortion legal in all 50 states through legislation, that’s why they went to the courts. Now the courts must say it’s not up to us to make abortion law, the state legislatures alone have that right.

Good News for Pro-Life Activists

Life

The Good News: SCOTUS backs Pro-Life activists.

The Bad News: AP displays its bias in the way it describes Pro-Lifers.

Supreme Court Backs Abortion Protesters

The Supreme Court dealt a setback Tuesday to abortion clinics in a two-decade-old legal fight over abortion protests, ruling that federal extortion and racketeering laws cannot be used to ban demonstrations.

Is this really just a [quote]setback[unquote] ? The Pro-Choice side seems to think SCOTUS is the final authority on everything so shouldn’t this settle the issue? The AP’s bias comes out in the second paragraph of the article:

Anti-abortion groups brought the appeal after the 7th Circuit had asked a trial judge to determine whether a nationwide injunction could be supported by charges that protesters had made threats of violence absent a connection with robbery or extortion

Instead of referring to the right-to-life side as Pro-Life, they call us [quote]Anti-abortion.[unquote]

This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay
or Gribbit
. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 150 blogs already on-board
.

PBA Ban in Court Again

Justice Life

SCOTUS has decided to hear a case involving the federal Partial Birth Abortion ban. The main argument in the past has focused on the “no health exception” problem.  Here’s a good reason why there’s no health exception in the law.

Why No “Health Exception”? Here’s Why!

If this procedure were done to save the health (or even the life) of the mother, what is the magical thing about leaving the baby’s head in and sucking his brains out — as opposed to delivering him completely and letting him die naturally — that saves the health of the mother? Is it necessary?

No, it’s not. The reason the head is left in there is because this is an abortion, not a medical procedure to save the woman. Death is the goal. The head must stay in otherwise the baby would be born. Health is not the reason these abortions occur–the desire for the baby to be dead is.

No More Waiting

Justice

The way this first paragraph is phrased, shows just how partisan the media really is. Saying this was “one of the most partisan victories in modern history,” reveals the AP writer’s bias.

Alito is Sworn in for Supreme Court

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. was sworn in as the nation’s 110th Supreme Court justice on Tuesday after being confirmed by the Senate in one of the most partisan victories in modern history.

Kennedy and Kerry really are pathetic. They didn’t even come close to mustering enough support in their own party to filibuster this nominee.

Glad to see you won’t have to wait any longer. Congratulations, Justice Alito!